↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative high-throughput profiling of snake venom gland transcriptomes and proteomes (Ovophis okinavensis and Protobothrops flavoviridis)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
133 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative high-throughput profiling of snake venom gland transcriptomes and proteomes (Ovophis okinavensis and Protobothrops flavoviridis)
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-790
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven D Aird, Yutaka Watanabe, Alejandro Villar-Briones, Michael C Roy, Kouki Terada, Alexander S Mikheyev

Abstract

Advances in DNA sequencing and proteomics have facilitated quantitative comparisons of snake venom composition. Most studies have employed one approach or the other. Here, both Illumina cDNA sequencing and LC/MS were used to compare the transcriptomes and proteomes of two pit vipers, Protobothrops flavoviridis and Ovophis okinavensis, which differ greatly in their biology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sudan 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 115 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 27 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 18%
Researcher 21 18%
Student > Master 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 14 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Chemistry 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 17 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,355,930
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,109
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,039
of 224,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#58
of 225 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 225 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.