You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The spinal stenosis pedometer and nutrition lifestyle intervention (SSPANLI) randomized controlled trial protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-322 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christy C Tomkins-Lane, Lynne MZ Lafave, Jill A Parnell, Ashok Krishnamurthy, Jocelyn Rempel, Luciana G Macedo, Stephanie Moriartey, Kent J Stuber, Philip M Wilson, Richard Hu, Yvette M Andreas |
| Abstract |
Because of symptoms, people with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are often inactive, and this sedentary behaviour implies risk for diseases including obesity. Research has identified body mass index as the most powerful predictor of function in LSS. This suggests that function may be improved by targeting weight as a modifiable factor. An e-health lifestyle intervention was developed aimed at reducing fat mass and increasing physical activity in people with LSS. The main components of this intervention include pedometer-based physical activity promotion and nutrition education. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 36 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 14% |
| Unknown | 80 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 20% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 18% |
| Psychology | 18 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 11% |
| Unknown | 88 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2014.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#1,598
of 4,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,505
of 224,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#19
of 88 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,514 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 88 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.