You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Probiotics for infantile colic: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-13-186 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jasim Anabrees, Flavia Indrio, Bosco Paes, Khalid AlFaleh |
| Abstract |
Infantile colic is a common paediatric condition which causes significant parental distress. Increased intestinal coliform colonization in addition to alteration in Lactobacillus abundance and distribution may play an important role in its pathogenesis. The objectives of this systematic review are to evaluate the efficacy of probiotic supplementation in the reduction of crying time and successful treatment of infantile colic. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Australia | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| South Africa | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | <1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 212 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 36 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Other | 23 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 9% |
| Other | 41 | 19% |
| Unknown | 38 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 73 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 34 | 16% |
| Unknown | 47 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2015.
All research outputs
#1,920,209
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#229
of 3,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,144
of 224,251 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,251 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.