↓ Skip to main content

The planarian regeneration transcriptome reveals a shared but temporally shifted regulatory program between opposing head and tail scenarios

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
49 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
114 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The planarian regeneration transcriptome reveals a shared but temporally shifted regulatory program between opposing head and tail scenarios
Published in
BMC Genomics, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-14-797
Pubmed ID
Authors

Damian Kao, Daniel Felix, Aziz Aboobaker

Abstract

Planarians can regenerate entire animals from a small fragment of the body. The regenerating fragment is able to create new tissues and remodel existing tissues to form a complete animal. Thus different fragments with very different starting components eventually converge on the same solution. In this study, we performed an extensive RNA-seq time-course on regenerating head and tail fragments to observe the differences and similarities of the transcriptional landscape between head and tail fragments during regeneration.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Israel 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 107 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 26%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 12 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 18 16%
Unknown 16 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Computer Science 1 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 <1%
Other 5 4%
Unknown 16 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 November 2013.
All research outputs
#7,102,956
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,357
of 10,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,978
of 187,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#33
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,628 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.