↓ Skip to main content

Diet and toenail arsenic concentrations in a New Hampshire population with arsenic-containing water

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
19 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diet and toenail arsenic concentrations in a New Hampshire population with arsenic-containing water
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-149
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kathryn L Cottingham, Roxanne Karimi, Joann F Gruber, M Scot Zens, Vicki Sayarath, Carol L Folt, Tracy Punshon, J Steven Morris, Margaret R Karagas

Abstract

Limited data exist on the contribution of dietary sources of arsenic to an individual's total exposure, particularly in populations with exposure via drinking water. Here, the association between diet and toenail arsenic concentrations (a long-term biomarker of exposure) was evaluated for individuals with measured household tap water arsenic. Foods known to be high in arsenic, including rice and seafood, were of particular interest.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 74 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 20%
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 14 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 16%
Environmental Science 12 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 9%
Social Sciences 6 8%
Chemistry 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 20 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 88. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2019.
All research outputs
#469,373
of 24,885,505 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#145
of 1,491 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,359
of 193,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,885,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,491 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,918 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.