You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Factors affecting pleural fluid adenosine deaminase level and the implication on the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion: a retrospective cohort study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Infectious Diseases, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2334-13-546 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Tunn Ren Tay, Augustine Tee |
Abstract |
Adenosine deaminase (ADA) is useful in the diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE). This study aims to determine the factors affecting pleural fluid ADA levels and to establish the optimal ADA levels for diagnosis of TPE for different age groups. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 59 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 13% |
Other | 7 | 12% |
Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 22% |
Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 42% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 8% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 20 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2020.
All research outputs
#14,766,517
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,057
of 7,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,710
of 187,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#66
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,662 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.