You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of a web-based intervention to reduce antibiotic prescribing for LRTI in six European countries: quantitative process analysis of the GRACE/INTRO randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-134 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Lucy Yardley, Elaine Douglas, Sibyl Anthierens, Sarah Tonkin-Crine, Gilly O’Reilly, Beth Stuart, Adam W. A. Geraghty, Emily Arden-Close, Alike W. van der Velden, Herman Goosens, Theo J. M. Verheij, Chris C. Butler, Nick A. Francis, Paul Little |
| Abstract |
To reduce the spread of antibiotic resistance, there is a pressing need for worldwide implementation of effective interventions to promote more prudent prescribing of antibiotics for acute LRTI. This study is a process analysis of the GRACE/INTRO trial of a multifactorial intervention that reduced antibiotic prescribing for acute LRTI in six European countries. The aim was to understand how the interventions were implemented and to examine effects of the interventions on general practitioners' (GPs') and patients' attitudes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Belgium | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 33% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 171 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 35 | 20% |
| Unknown | 36 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 44 | 25% |
| Psychology | 20 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 15 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,735,150
of 23,313,051 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#917
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,334
of 212,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,313,051 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.