You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Impact of a mobile phone and web program on symptom and functional outcomes for people with mild-to-moderate depression, anxiety and stress: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-312 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Judith Proudfoot, Janine Clarke, Mary-Rose Birch, Alexis E Whitton, Gordon Parker, Vijaya Manicavasagar, Virginia Harrison, Helen Christensen, Dusan Hadzi-Pavlovic |
| Abstract |
Mobile phone-based psychological interventions enable real time self-monitoring and self-management, and large-scale dissemination. However, few studies have focussed on mild-to-moderate symptoms where public health need is greatest, and none have targeted work and social functioning. This study reports outcomes of a CONSORT-compliant randomised controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the efficacy of myCompass, a self-guided psychological treatment delivered via mobile phone and computer, designed to reduce mild-to-moderate depression, anxiety and stress, and improve work and social functioning. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 552 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 544 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 102 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 91 | 16% |
| Researcher | 85 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 34 | 6% |
| Other | 78 | 14% |
| Unknown | 106 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 186 | 34% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 28 | 5% |
| Other | 63 | 11% |
| Unknown | 133 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2019.
All research outputs
#1,234,781
of 24,673,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#374
of 5,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,534
of 313,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#11
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,673,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.