You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pulmonary function after less invasive anterior instrumentation and fusion for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scoliosis, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-7161-8-14 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geertje C Huitema, Rob C Jansen, Edward Dompeling, Paul Willems, Ilona Punt, Lodewijk W van Rhijn |
| Abstract |
Standard thoracotomy for anterior instrumentation and fusion of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis may have detrimental effects on pulmonary function. In this study we describe a less invasive anterior surgical technique and show the pre- and postoperative pulmonary function with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 6 | 21% |
| Researcher | 5 | 18% |
| Other | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 64% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Engineering | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2013.
All research outputs
#13,396,317
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Scoliosis
#99
of 221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,695
of 198,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scoliosis
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.