↓ Skip to main content

Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modality matters for the expression of inducible defenses: introducing a concept of predator modality
Published in
BMC Biology, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1741-7007-11-113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Quirin Herzog, Christian Laforsch

Abstract

Inducible defenses are a common and widespread form of phenotypic plasticity. A fundamental factor driving their evolution is an unpredictable and heterogeneous predation pressure. This heterogeneity is often used synonymously to quantitative changes in predation risk, depending on the abundance and impact of predators. However, differences in 'modality', that is, the qualitative aspect of natural selection caused by predators, can also cause heterogeneity. For instance, predators of the small planktonic crustacean Daphnia have been divided into two functional groups of predators: vertebrates and invertebrates. Predators of both groups are known to cause different defenses, yet predators of the same group are considered to cause similar responses. In our study we question that thought and address the issue of how multiple predators affect the expression and evolution of inducible defenses.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 1%
France 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 71 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 26%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 9 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 10 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 64%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 10%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 13 17%