↓ Skip to main content

Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chinese herbal medicine for the treatment of recurrent miscarriage: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials
Published in
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6882-13-320
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guo-Yan Yang, Hui Luo, Xing Liao, Jian-Ping Liu

Abstract

Traditional Chinese medicine has been widely used for the treatment of recurrent miscarriage in China and other Asian countries for long time. We conducted this review to systematically summarize the evidences of Chinese herbal medicine (CHM) for the prevention and treatment of recurrent miscarriage in randomized trials, and evaluate the effectiveness and safety of CHM compared with placebo or conventional medicine.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 20%
Student > Postgraduate 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 12%
Researcher 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Other 11 27%
Unknown 5 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 5 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 November 2013.
All research outputs
#14,182,545
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,678
of 3,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,227
of 302,168 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#53
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,620 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,168 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.