↓ Skip to main content

Early accelerated senescence of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in premature coronary artery disease patients in a developing country - a case control study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Early accelerated senescence of circulating endothelial progenitor cells in premature coronary artery disease patients in a developing country - a case control study
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2261-13-104
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kranthi Vemparala, Ambuj Roy, Vinay Kumar Bahl, Dorairaj Prabhakaran, Neera Nath, Subrata Sinha, Pradipta Nandi, Ravindra Mohan Pandey, Kolli Srinath Reddy, Ajay Manhapra, Ramakrishnan Lakshmy

Abstract

The decreased number and senescence of circulating endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are considered markers of vascular senescence associated with aging, atherosclerosis, and coronary artery disease (CAD) in elderly. In this study, we explore the role of vascular senescence in premature CAD (PCAD) in a developing country by comparing the numerical status and senescence of circulating EPCs in PCAD patients to controls.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 3 5%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 16 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#13,700,474
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#609
of 1,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,207
of 302,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
#8
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.