You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is combined use of intravenous and intraarticular tranexamic acid superior to intravenous or intraarticular tranexamic acid alone in total knee arthroplasty? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13018-017-0559-2 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bobin Mi, Guohui Liu, Huijuan Lv, Yi Liu, Kun Zha, Qipeng Wu, Jing Liu |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Student > Master | 5 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 53% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 14 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,014,252
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#283
of 1,394 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,273
of 310,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#10
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,394 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 310,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.