You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Radically open-dialectical behavior therapy for adult anorexia nervosa: feasibility and outcomes from an inpatient program
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-13-293 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas R Lynch, Katie LH Gray, Roelie J Hempel, Marian Titley, Eunice Y Chen, Heather A O’Mahen |
| Abstract |
Anorexia Nervosa (AN) is a highly life-threatening disorder that is extremely difficult to treat. There is evidence that family-based therapies are effective for adolescent AN, but no treatment has been proven to be clearly effective for adult AN. The methodological challenges associated with studying the disorder have resulted in recommendations that new treatments undergo preliminary testing prior to being evaluated in a randomized clinical trial. The aim of this study was to provide preliminary evidence on the effectiveness of a treatment program based on a novel adaptation of Dialectical Behavior Therapy (DBT) for adult Anorexia Nervosa (Radically Open-DBT; RO-DBT) that conceptualizes AN as a disorder of overcontrol. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 260 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 253 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 29 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 10% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Other | 45 | 17% |
| Unknown | 64 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 124 | 48% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 26 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 18 | 7% |
| Unknown | 75 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#1,740,378
of 23,515,383 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#588
of 4,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,048
of 217,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#16
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,515,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.