↓ Skip to main content

Diaphragm motion and lung function prediction in patients operated for lung cancer – a pilot study on 27 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 200)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diaphragm motion and lung function prediction in patients operated for lung cancer – a pilot study on 27 patients
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1749-8090-8-213
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dragan R Subotic, Ruza Stevic, Milan Gajic, Radomir Vesovic

Abstract

The influence of the diaphragm motion to the accuracy of postoperative lung function prediction after the lung resction is still debatable.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 23 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Postgraduate 4 17%
Other 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 67%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 8%
Mathematics 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 November 2013.
All research outputs
#604,630
of 3,685,110 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#11
of 200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,904
of 108,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,685,110 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 200 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 108,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.