↓ Skip to main content

Clinicopathologic significance of claudin-6, occludin, and matrix metalloproteinases −2 expression in ovarian carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Diagnostic Pathology, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinicopathologic significance of claudin-6, occludin, and matrix metalloproteinases −2 expression in ovarian carcinoma
Published in
Diagnostic Pathology, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1746-1596-8-190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liping Wang, Xiangshu Jin, Dongjing Lin, Zhijing Liu, Xiaowei Zhang, Yan Lu, Yuanyuan Liu, Min Wang, Minlan Yang, Jiuxia Li, Chengshi Quan

Abstract

Tight junctions (TJs) are mainly composed of claudins, occludin, and tight junction adhesion molecules (JAM). The invasive and metastatic phenotype of highly invasive cancer cells has been related to abnormal structure and function of TJs, and with expression of activated matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). The relevance of these mechanisms responsible for the invasion and metastasis of ovarian carcinoma is unclear. Similarly, it is not known if the expression of claudin-6, occludin and MMP2 is related with the clinical properties of these tumors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 17%
Student > Bachelor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Professor 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 9 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Computer Science 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,703,558
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Diagnostic Pathology
#672
of 1,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,522
of 302,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diagnostic Pathology
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.