You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Human milk feeding supports adequate growth in infants ≤ 1250 grams birth weight
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-6-459 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Amy B Hair, Keli M Hawthorne, Katherine E Chetta, Steven A Abrams |
Abstract |
Despite current nutritional strategies, premature infants remain at high risk for extrauterine growth restriction. The use of an exclusive human milk-based diet is associated with decreased incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), but concerns exist about infants achieving adequate growth. The objective of this study was to evaluate growth velocities and incidence of extrauterine growth restriction in infants ≤ 1250 grams (g) birth weight (BW) receiving an exclusive human milk-based diet with early and rapid advancement of fortification using a donor human milk derived fortifier. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 25% |
Canada | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
United States | 2 | 2% |
Canada | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 17 | 20% |
Other | 9 | 11% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
Other | 17 | 20% |
Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 54% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 2% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 1% |
Other | 2 | 2% |
Unknown | 19 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 682. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#27,619
of 23,850,698 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2
of 4,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159
of 216,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,850,698 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.