You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurological outcomes in patients transported to hospital without a prehospital return of spontaneous circulation after cardiac arrest
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13121 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yoshikazu Goto, Tetsuo Maeda, Yumiko Nakatsu-Goto |
| Abstract |
As emergency medical services (EMS) personnel in Japan are not allowed to perform termination of resuscitation in the field, most patients experiencing an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) are transported to hospitals without a prehospital return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). As the crucial prehospital factors for outcomes are not clear in patients who had an OHCA without a prehospital ROSC, we aimed to determine the prehospital factors associated with 1-month favorable neurological outcomes (Cerebral Performance Category scale 1 or 2 (CPC 1-2)). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 33% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| South Africa | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| South Africa | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 95 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 17 | 17% |
| Researcher | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 20% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 63 | 64% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 23 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2014.
All research outputs
#2,470,619
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,139
of 6,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,498
of 317,565 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#9
of 100 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,565 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 100 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.