↓ Skip to main content

Population-based analysis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use among children in four European countries in the SOS project: what size of data platforms and which study designs do we need to…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Population-based analysis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use among children in four European countries in the SOS project: what size of data platforms and which study designs do we need to assess safety issues?
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-13-192
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vera E Valkhoff, René Schade, Geert W ‘t Jong, Silvana Romio, Martijn J Schuemie, Andrea Arfe, Edeltraut Garbe, Ron Herings, Silvia Lucchi, Gino Picelli, Tania Schink, Huub Straatman, Marco Villa, Ernst J Kuipers, Miriam CJM Sturkenboom

Abstract

Data on utilization patterns and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in children are scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the utilization of NSAIDs among children in four European countries as part of the Safety Of non-Steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (SOS) project.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Portugal 1 1%
France 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 19%
Student > Master 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Other 10 12%
Unknown 19 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 October 2016.
All research outputs
#3,108,279
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#478
of 2,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,441
of 302,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#13
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.