↓ Skip to main content

A strategy for reducing maternal and newborn deaths by 2015 and beyond

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
28 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A strategy for reducing maternal and newborn deaths by 2015 and beyond
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-13-216
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gary L Darmstadt, Tanya Marchant, Mariam Claeson, Win Brown, Saul Morris, France Donnay, Mary Taylor, Rebecca Ferguson, Shirine Voller, Katherine C Teela, Krystyna Makowiecka, Zelee Hill, Lindsay Mangham-Jefferies, Bilal Avan, Neil Spicer, Cyril Engmann, Nana Twum-Danso, Kate Somers, Dan Kraushaar, Joanna Schellenberg

Abstract

Achievement of Millennium Development Goal (MDG) 4 for child survival requires acceleration of gains in newborn survival, and current trends in improving maternal health will also fall short of reaching MDG 5 without more strategic actions. We present a Maternal Newborn and Child Health (MNCH) strategy for accelerating progress on MDGs 4 and 5, sustaining the gains beyond 2015, and further bringing down maternal and child mortality by two thirds by 2030.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 195 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 51 26%
Researcher 27 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 10%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Student > Bachelor 14 7%
Other 39 20%
Unknown 35 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 33 17%
Social Sciences 26 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 2%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 43 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 July 2018.
All research outputs
#1,074,837
of 24,260,998 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#217
of 4,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,801
of 311,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#5
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,260,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,520 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.