↓ Skip to main content

Dipeptide repeat proteins are present in the p62 positive inclusions in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neurone disease associated with expansions in C9ORF72

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neuropathologica Communications, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
patent
4 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
163 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dipeptide repeat proteins are present in the p62 positive inclusions in patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration and motor neurone disease associated with expansions in C9ORF72
Published in
Acta Neuropathologica Communications, October 2013
DOI 10.1186/2051-5960-1-68
Pubmed ID
Authors

David MA Mann, Sara Rollinson, Andrew Robinson, Janis Bennion Callister, Jennifer C Thompson, Julie S Snowden, Tania Gendron, Leonard Petrucelli, Masami Masuda-Suzukake, Masato Hasegawa, Yvonne Davidson, Stuart Pickering-Brown

Abstract

Cases of Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD) and Motor Neurone Disease (MND) associated with expansions in C9ORF72 gene are characterised pathologically by the presence of TDP-43 negative, but p62 positive, inclusions in granule cells of the cerebellum and in cells of dentate gyrus and area CA4 of the hippocampus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 149 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 28%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 14 9%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 19 13%
Unknown 31 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 28%
Neuroscience 36 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 7%
Psychology 2 1%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 32 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,767,267
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#223
of 1,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,411
of 210,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neuropathologica Communications
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 210,689 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.