↓ Skip to main content

Dietary iron does not impact the quality of life of patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis: an observational study

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dietary iron does not impact the quality of life of patients with quiescent ulcerative colitis: an observational study
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-152
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zoe Tolkien, Dora IA Pereira, Laura Prassmayer, Emily Fitt, Gerda Pot, Simon M Greenfield, Jonathan J Powell

Abstract

In animal models, excess luminal iron exacerbates colonic inflammation and cancer development. Moreover, in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients with mild to moderate disease activity dietary fortificant iron intake is inversely related to quality of life. Here we sought to determine whether dietary iron intakes were also related to quality of life in IBD patients in remission.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Researcher 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Other 4 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 12%
Psychology 4 8%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 16 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2013.
All research outputs
#3,136,001
of 4,505,617 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#640
of 729 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,239
of 118,944 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#27
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,505,617 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 729 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 118,944 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.