↓ Skip to main content

CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medicine, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
2949 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
764 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials
Published in
BMC Medicine, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenneth F Schulz, Douglas G Altman, David Moher, the CONSORT Group

Abstract

The CONSORT statement is used worldwide to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials. Kenneth Schulz and colleagues describe the latest version, CONSORT 2010, which updates the reporting guideline based on new methodological evidence and accumulating experience.To encourage dissemination of the CONSORT 2010 Statement, this article is freely accessible on bmj.com and will also be published in the Lancet, Obstetrics and Gynecology, PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Open Medicine, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, BMC Medicine, and Trials.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 764 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 746 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 126 16%
Student > Master 100 13%
Researcher 92 12%
Student > Bachelor 75 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 6%
Other 157 21%
Unknown 170 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 248 32%
Nursing and Health Professions 90 12%
Psychology 57 7%
Social Sciences 33 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 3%
Other 100 13%
Unknown 212 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#935,896
of 25,721,020 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#650
of 4,079 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,670
of 104,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,721,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,079 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.