You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A randomized 3x3 crossover study to evaluate the effect of Hass avocado intake on post-ingestive satiety, glucose and insulin levels, and subsequent energy intake in overweight adults
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-155 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Michelle Wien, Ella Haddad, Keiji Oda, Joan Sabaté |
Abstract |
The behavioral outcome of food ingestion is a complex process that involves psychological and biological factors. Avocados are nutrient dense with properties that may favorably impact energy balance. This study sought to evaluate if incorporating approximately one half of a Hass avocado by addition or inclusion into a lunch meal will influence post-ingestive satiety, glucose and insulin response, and subsequent energy intake among overweight adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 332 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 81 | 24% |
Spain | 18 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 14 | 4% |
Australia | 9 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 9 | 3% |
Canada | 7 | 2% |
South Africa | 5 | 2% |
Chile | 5 | 2% |
Netherlands | 4 | 1% |
Other | 40 | 12% |
Unknown | 140 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 258 | 78% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 59 | 18% |
Scientists | 8 | 2% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | <1% |
Japan | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 185 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 35 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 26 | 14% |
Researcher | 18 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
Other | 13 | 7% |
Other | 34 | 18% |
Unknown | 48 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 37 | 19% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 6% |
Computer Science | 4 | 2% |
Other | 23 | 12% |
Unknown | 58 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1045. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,316
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80
of 322,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.