↓ Skip to main content

A randomized 3x3 crossover study to evaluate the effect of Hass avocado intake on post-ingestive satiety, glucose and insulin levels, and subsequent energy intake in overweight adults

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 1,529)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
94 news outlets
blogs
7 blogs
twitter
332 X users
facebook
10 Facebook pages
googleplus
36 Google+ users
video
9 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
190 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A randomized 3x3 crossover study to evaluate the effect of Hass avocado intake on post-ingestive satiety, glucose and insulin levels, and subsequent energy intake in overweight adults
Published in
Nutrition Journal, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-155
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michelle Wien, Ella Haddad, Keiji Oda, Joan Sabaté

Abstract

The behavioral outcome of food ingestion is a complex process that involves psychological and biological factors. Avocados are nutrient dense with properties that may favorably impact energy balance. This study sought to evaluate if incorporating approximately one half of a Hass avocado by addition or inclusion into a lunch meal will influence post-ingestive satiety, glucose and insulin response, and subsequent energy intake among overweight adults.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 332 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Chile 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 185 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 18%
Student > Bachelor 26 14%
Researcher 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Other 13 7%
Other 34 18%
Unknown 48 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 30 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 6%
Computer Science 4 2%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 58 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1045. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#15,316
of 25,753,031 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#5
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80
of 322,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,753,031 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 41.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.