↓ Skip to main content

Stereotactic Body radiation therapy for liver tumors with or without rotational intensity modulated radiation therapy

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stereotactic Body radiation therapy for liver tumors with or without rotational intensity modulated radiation therapy
Published in
BMC Research Notes, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-6-492
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elodie Nouhaud, Gilles Créhange, Adèle Cueff, Magali Quivrin, Magali Rouffiac-Thouant, Laurent Mineur, Robin Garcia, Jérôme Chamois, Philippe Maingon

Abstract

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for primary liver lesions and liver metastases treated with linear accelerators with or without rotational Intensity Modulated RadioTherapy (IMRT).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Other 7 24%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Unspecified 1 3%
Physics and Astronomy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 5 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2015.
All research outputs
#15,286,644
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#2,312
of 4,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#192,365
of 306,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#69
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.