You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care: a review of theoretical components
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, November 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-8-138 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Randa Attieh, Marie-Pierre Gagnon, Carole A Estabrooks, France Légaré, Mathieu Ouimet, Geneviève Roch, El Kebir Ghandour, Jeremy Grimshaw |
| Abstract |
With the persistent gaps between research and practice in healthcare systems, knowledge translation (KT) has gained significance and importance. Also, in most industrialized countries, there is an increasing emphasis on managing chronic health conditions with the best available evidence. Yet, organizations aiming to improve chronic care (CC) require an adequate level of organizational readiness (OR) for KT.Objectives: The purpose of this study is to review and synthesize the existing evidence on conceptual models/frameworks of Organizational Readiness for Change (ORC) in healthcare as the basis for the development of a comprehensive framework of OR for KT in the context of CC. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 30% |
| United States | 2 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 15% |
| Scientists | 3 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 233 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 214 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 20% |
| Researcher | 46 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 6% |
| Other | 50 | 21% |
| Unknown | 38 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 35 | 15% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 28 | 12% |
| Psychology | 27 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 10% |
| Other | 36 | 15% |
| Unknown | 44 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2019.
All research outputs
#2,761,403
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#571
of 1,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,812
of 320,392 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,392 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.