↓ Skip to main content

Theory-and evidence-based development and process evaluation of the Move More for Lifeprogram: a tailored-print intervention designed to promote physical activity among post-treatment breast cancer…

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Theory-and evidence-based development and process evaluation of the Move More for Lifeprogram: a tailored-print intervention designed to promote physical activity among post-treatment breast cancer survivors
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-10-124
Pubmed ID
Authors

Camille E Short, Erica L James, Ronald C Plotnikoff

Abstract

Several physical activity interventions have been effective in improving the health outcomes of breast cancer survivors. However, few interventions have provided detailed descriptions regarding how such interventions work. To develop evidence-based practice in this field, detailed descriptions of intervention development and delivery is needed. This paper aims to (1) describe the theory-and evidence-based development of the Move More for Life program, a physical activity program for breast cancer survivors; and (2) serve as an exemplar for theory-based applied research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 2%
Mexico 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 103 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Student > Master 17 16%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 21 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 17 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 12%
Social Sciences 11 10%
Sports and Recreations 11 10%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 December 2013.
All research outputs
#19,945,185
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#2,016
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,534
of 228,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#25
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,610 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.