↓ Skip to main content

Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 2,164)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
policy
4 policy sources
twitter
39 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
397 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
513 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lyndal J Trevena, Brian J Zikmund-Fisher, Adrian Edwards, Wolfgang Gaissmaier, Mirta Galesic, Paul KJ Han, John King, Margaret L Lawson, Suzanne K Linder, Isaac Lipkus, Elissa Ozanne, Ellen Peters, Danielle Timmermans, Steven Woloshin

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 513 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 495 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 75 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 14%
Student > Master 68 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 33 6%
Other 32 6%
Other 111 22%
Unknown 122 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 24%
Psychology 43 8%
Social Sciences 38 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 5%
Computer Science 24 5%
Other 103 20%
Unknown 158 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 57. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2023.
All research outputs
#756,668
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#18
of 2,164 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,680
of 327,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,164 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.