↓ Skip to main content

Added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced Hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Imaging, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced Hepatobiliary phase MR imaging in evaluation of focal solid hepatic lesions
Published in
BMC Medical Imaging, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2342-13-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Haimerl, Max Wächtler, Ivan Platzek, Rene Müller-Wille, Christoph Niessen, Patrick Hoffstetter, Andreas Georg Schreyer, Christian Stroszczynski, Philipp Wiggermann

Abstract

Correct characterization of focal solid hepatic lesions has always been a challenge and is of great diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. The purpose of this study was to determine the added value of hepatobiliary phase images in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for differentiating focal solid hepatic lesions.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 24%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 19%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Other 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 4 19%
Unknown 1 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 71%
Sports and Recreations 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Unknown 4 19%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2013.
All research outputs
#2,076,247
of 5,034,930 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#67
of 184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#44,727
of 130,702 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 5,034,930 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 57th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 184 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,702 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.