↓ Skip to main content

The changing burden of malaria and association with vector control interventions in Zambia using district-level surveillance data, 2006–2011

Overview of attention for article published in Malaria Journal, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The changing burden of malaria and association with vector control interventions in Zambia using district-level surveillance data, 2006–2011
Published in
Malaria Journal, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2875-12-437
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mulakwa Kamuliwo, Emmanuel Chanda, Ubydul Haque, Mercy Mwanza-Ingwe, Chadwick Sikaala, Cecilia Katebe-Sakala, Victor M Mukonka, Douglas E Norris, David L Smith, Gregory E Glass, William J Moss

Abstract

Malaria control was strengthened in Zambia over the past decade. The two primary interventions for vector control are indoor residual spraying (IRS) and long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs). Using passive malaria surveillance data collected from 2006 to 2011 through the Zambian District Health Information System, the associations between increased coverage with LLINs and IRS and the burden of malaria in Zambia were evaluated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 165 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 25%
Researcher 26 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 16%
Student > Postgraduate 10 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 25 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 12%
Social Sciences 19 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 4%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 26 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 December 2014.
All research outputs
#4,926,099
of 24,400,706 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,209
of 5,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,170
of 317,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#16
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,400,706 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,827 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.