↓ Skip to main content

Protocol for the New Medicine Service Study: a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation with qualitative appraisal comparing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the New Medicine…

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
252 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Protocol for the New Medicine Service Study: a randomized controlled trial and economic evaluation with qualitative appraisal comparing the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the New Medicine Service in community pharmacies in England
Published in
Trials, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-14-411
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Boyd, Justin Waring, Nick Barber, Rajnikant Mehta, Antony Chuter, Anthony J Avery, Nde-Eshimuni Salema, James Davies, Asam Latif, Lukasz Tanajewski, Rachel A Elliott

Abstract

Medication non-adherence is considered an important cause of morbidity and mortality in primary care. This study aims to determine the effectiveness, cost effectiveness and acceptability of a complex intervention delivered by community pharmacists, the New Medicine Service (NMS), compared with current practice in reducing non-adherence to, and problems with, newly prescribed medicines for chronic conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 252 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 247 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 15%
Student > Master 34 13%
Researcher 28 11%
Student > Bachelor 22 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 8%
Other 45 18%
Unknown 64 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 27%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 42 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Psychology 8 3%
Other 27 11%
Unknown 77 31%