You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Land-use and land-management change: relationships with earthworm and fungi communities and soil structural properties
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6785-13-46 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David J Spurgeon, Aidan M Keith, Olaf Schmidt, Dennis R Lammertsma, Jack H Faber |
| Abstract |
Change in land use and management can impact massively on soil ecosystems. Ecosystem engineers and other functional biodiversity in soils can be influenced directly by such change and this in turn can affect key soil functions. Here, we employ meta-analysis to provide a quantitative assessment of the effects of changes in land use and land management across a range of successional/extensification transitions (conventional arable → no or reduced tillage → grassland → wooded land) on community metrics for two functionally important soil taxa, earthworms and fungi. An analysis of the relationships between community change and soil structural properties was also included. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Ireland | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Kenya | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 15% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 15% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 225 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 221 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 46 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 48 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 92 | 41% |
| Environmental Science | 45 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 10 | 4% |
| Unknown | 60 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2017.
All research outputs
#5,118,224
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#1,249
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,400
of 320,954 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#19
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,954 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.