↓ Skip to main content

Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: a quality dimension of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: a quality dimension of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor M Montori, Annie LeBlanc, Angela Buchholz, Diana L Stilwell, Apostolos Tsapas

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 109 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 17%
Researcher 18 16%
Student > Master 17 15%
Other 10 9%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 28 25%
Unknown 13 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Psychology 8 7%
Decision Sciences 4 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 3%
Other 23 21%
Unknown 18 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#9,928,413
of 12,402,464 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#929
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,866
of 223,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#109
of 119 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,402,464 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,666 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 119 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.