↓ Skip to main content

Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: a quality dimension of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Basing information on comprehensive, critically appraised, and up-to-date syntheses of the scientific evidence: a quality dimension of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor M Montori, Annie LeBlanc, Angela Buchholz, Diana L Stilwell, Apostolos Tsapas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 15%
Student > Master 17 14%
Other 10 8%
Professor 7 6%
Other 29 23%
Unknown 18 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 8%
Psychology 9 7%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Decision Sciences 4 3%
Other 26 21%
Unknown 24 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 December 2013.
All research outputs
#18,355,685
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#1,567
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,984
of 306,996 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#38
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,996 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.