You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ivermectin to reduce malaria transmission I. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic considerations regarding efficacy and safety
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, April 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12936-017-1801-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Chaccour, Felix Hammann, N. Regina Rabinovich |
| Abstract |
Ivermectin is an endectocide that has been used broadly in single dose community campaigns for the control of onchocerciasis and lymphatic filariasis for more than 30 years. There is now interest in the potential use of ivermectin regimens to reduce malaria transmission, envisaged as community-wide campaigns tailored to transmission patterns and as complement of the local vector control programme. The development of new ivermectin regimens or other novel endectocides will require integrated development of the drug in the context of traditional entomological tools and endpoints. This document examines the main pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of the medicine and their potential influence on its vector control efficacy and safety at population level. This information could be valuable for trial design and clinical development into regulatory and policy pathways. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 95 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 13 | 14% |
| Japan | 7 | 7% |
| Canada | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 63 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 83 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 6% |
| Scientists | 3 | 3% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 212 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 28 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 13% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 44 | 21% |
| Unknown | 58 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 38 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 17 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 18% |
| Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 96. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 July 2023.
All research outputs
#447,147
of 25,726,194 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#43
of 5,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,199
of 324,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,726,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,285 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.