↓ Skip to main content

The 6R’s of drug induced nephrotoxicity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nephrology, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The 6R’s of drug induced nephrotoxicity
Published in
BMC Nephrology, April 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12882-017-0536-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Linda Awdishu, Ravindra L. Mehta

Abstract

Drug induced kidney injury is a frequent adverse event which contributes to morbidity and increased healthcare utilization. Our current knowledge of drug induced kidney disease is limited due to varying definitions of kidney injury, incomplete assessment of concurrent risk factors and lack of long term outcome reporting. Electronic surveillance presents a powerful tool to identify susceptible populations, improve recognition of events and provide decision support on preventative strategies or early intervention in the case of injury. Research in the area of biomarkers for detecting kidney injury and genetic predisposition for this adverse event will enhance detection of injury, identify those susceptible to injury and likely mitigate risk. In this review we will present a 6R framework to identify and mange drug induced kidney injury - risk, recognition, response, renal support, rehabilitation and research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 293 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 9%
Researcher 24 8%
Student > Postgraduate 18 6%
Other 47 16%
Unknown 108 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 65 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 52 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 116 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,479,080
of 23,929,753 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nephrology
#81
of 2,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,158
of 311,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nephrology
#1
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,929,753 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,572 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.