You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The intra- and inter-rater reliability of five clinical muscle performance tests in patients with and without neck pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-14-339 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tina Juul, Henning Langberg, Flemming Enoch, Karen Søgaard |
| Abstract |
This study investigates the reliability of muscle performance tests using cost- and time-effective methods similar to those used in clinical practice. When conducting reliability studies, great effort goes into standardising test procedures to facilitate a stable outcome. Therefore, several test trials are often performed. However, when muscle performance tests are applied in the clinical setting, clinicians often only conduct a muscle performance test once as repeated testing may produce fatigue and pain, thus variation in test results. We aimed to investigate whether cervical muscle performance tests, which have shown promising psychometric properties, would remain reliable when examined under conditions similar to those of daily clinical practice. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 5 | 38% |
| Germany | 1 | 8% |
| Norway | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 77% |
| Scientists | 2 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 317 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 97 | 30% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 6% |
| Researcher | 16 | 5% |
| Other | 60 | 19% |
| Unknown | 68 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 108 | 34% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 70 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 11% |
| Unknown | 76 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,434,245
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#700
of 4,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,522
of 312,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#9
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,185 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.