↓ Skip to main content

Using google street view for systematic observation of the built environment: analysis of spatio-temporal instability of imagery dates

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Health Geographics, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using google street view for systematic observation of the built environment: analysis of spatio-temporal instability of imagery dates
Published in
International Journal of Health Geographics, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1476-072x-12-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jacqueline W Curtis, Andrew Curtis, Jennifer Mapes, Andrea B Szell, Adam Cinderich

Abstract

Recently, Google Street View (GSV) has been examined as a tool for remotely conducting systematic observation of the built environment. Studies have found it offers benefits over in-person audits, including efficiency, safety, cost, and the potential to expand built environment research to larger areas and more places globally. However, one limitation has been the lack of documentation on the date of imagery collection. In 2011, Google began placing a date stamp on images which now enables investigation of this concern. This study questions the spatio-temporal stability in the GSV date stamp. Specifically, is the imagery collected contemporaneously? If not, how frequently and where is imagery from different time periods woven together to represent environmental conditions in a particular place. Furthermore, how much continuity exists in imagery for a particular time period? Answering these questions will provide guidance on the use of GSV as a tool for built environment audits.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Unknown 107 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 18%
Student > Master 19 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 22 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 24 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 10%
Engineering 8 7%
Psychology 6 6%
Environmental Science 5 5%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 30 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2014.
All research outputs
#7,896,932
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Health Geographics
#258
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,420
of 320,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Health Geographics
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,279 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.