↓ Skip to main content

Content analysis of medical students’ seminars: a unique method of analyzing clinical thinking

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Education, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Content analysis of medical students’ seminars: a unique method of analyzing clinical thinking
Published in
BMC Medical Education, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6920-13-156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yukari Takata, Gerald H Stein, Kuniyuki Endo, Akiko Arai, Shun Kohsaka, Yuka Kitano, Hitoshi Honda, Hidetaka Kitazono, Hironobu Tokunaga, Yasuharu Tokuda, Mikako Obika, Tomoko Miyoshi, Hitomi Kataoka, Hidekazu Terasawa

Abstract

The study of communication skills of Asian medical students during structured Problem-based Learning (PBL) seminars represented a unique opportunity to assess their critical thinking development. This study reports the first application of the health education technology, content analysis (CA), to a Japanese web-based seminar (webinar).

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Thailand 1 1%
Unknown 70 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Bachelor 9 13%
Student > Master 8 11%
Researcher 7 10%
Other 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 19 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 28%
Social Sciences 10 14%
Psychology 7 10%
Engineering 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2013.
All research outputs
#20,211,690
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#3,124
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#267,560
of 307,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#34
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.