↓ Skip to main content

Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to assess barriers to feeding critically ill patients

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Development and psychometric properties of a questionnaire to assess barriers to feeding critically ill patients
Published in
Implementation Science, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-8-140
Pubmed ID
Authors

Naomi E Cahill, Andrew G Day, Deborah Cook, Daren K Heyland

Abstract

To successfully implement the recommendations of critical care nutrition guidelines, one potential approach is to identify barriers to providing optimal enteral nutrition (EN) in the intensive care unit (ICU), and then address these barriers systematically. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a questionnaire to assess barriers to enterally feeding critically ill patients and to conduct preliminary validity testing of the new instrument.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 14%
Researcher 7 12%
Other 4 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Other 14 24%
Unknown 9 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 25%
Psychology 6 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 14 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 December 2013.
All research outputs
#6,379,300
of 21,740,538 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,103
of 1,689 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,070
of 306,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#77
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,740,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,689 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.