You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1129 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Shoba Ramanadhan, Samuel R Mendez, Megan Rao, Kasisomayajula Viswanath |
Abstract |
Community-based organizations (CBOs) are critical channels for the delivery of health promotion programs. Much of their influence comes from the relationships they have with community members and other key stakeholders and they may be able to harness the power of social media tools to develop and maintain these relationships. There are limited data describing if and how CBOs are using social media. This study assesses the extent to which CBOs engaged in health promotion use popular social media channels, the types of content typically shared, and the extent to which the interactive aspects of social media tools are utilized. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 16 | 27% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 10% |
India | 3 | 5% |
Philippines | 2 | 3% |
Colombia | 2 | 3% |
El Salvador | 2 | 3% |
Australia | 2 | 3% |
Argentina | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 7% |
Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 42 | 71% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 22% |
Scientists | 4 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 1% |
Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
Brazil | 2 | <1% |
Spain | 2 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 260 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 71 | 26% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 39 | 14% |
Researcher | 24 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
Other | 55 | 20% |
Unknown | 45 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 56 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 13% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 11% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 30 | 11% |
Computer Science | 23 | 8% |
Other | 50 | 18% |
Unknown | 49 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#915,659
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#979
of 16,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,661
of 320,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#16
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.