↓ Skip to main content

Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
59 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
97 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social media use by community-based organizations conducting health promotion: a content analysis
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-13-1129
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shoba Ramanadhan, Samuel R Mendez, Megan Rao, Kasisomayajula Viswanath

Abstract

Community-based organizations (CBOs) are critical channels for the delivery of health promotion programs. Much of their influence comes from the relationships they have with community members and other key stakeholders and they may be able to harness the power of social media tools to develop and maintain these relationships. There are limited data describing if and how CBOs are using social media. This study assesses the extent to which CBOs engaged in health promotion use popular social media channels, the types of content typically shared, and the extent to which the interactive aspects of social media tools are utilized.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 260 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 14%
Researcher 24 9%
Student > Bachelor 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 55 20%
Unknown 45 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 56 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 35 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 30 11%
Computer Science 23 8%
Other 50 18%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2021.
All research outputs
#915,659
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#979
of 16,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,661
of 320,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#16
of 260 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 260 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.