↓ Skip to main content

A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation

Overview of attention for article published in Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
219 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A further critique of the analytic strategy of adjusting for covariates to identify biologic mediation
Published in
Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations, October 2004
DOI 10.1186/1742-5573-1-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jay S Kaufman, Richard F MacLehose, Sol Kaufman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 8 4%
Belgium 2 1%
Canada 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 167 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 27%
Researcher 36 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 14 8%
Student > Master 14 8%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 20 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 35%
Social Sciences 25 14%
Mathematics 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 21 12%
Unknown 42 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2022.
All research outputs
#7,525,196
of 22,965,074 outputs
Outputs from Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
#22
of 36 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,097
of 61,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Epidemiologic Perspectives & Innovations
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,965,074 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one scored the same or higher as 14 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,854 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.