↓ Skip to main content

Characterization of CurcuEmulsomes: nanoformulation for enhanced solubility anddelivery of curcumin

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 1,959)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
59 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
99 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Characterization of CurcuEmulsomes: nanoformulation for enhanced solubility anddelivery of curcumin
Published in
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1477-3155-11-37
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mehmet H Ucisik, Seta Küpcü, Bernhard Schuster, Uwe B Sleytr

Abstract

Curcumin is a polyphenolic compound isolated from the rhizomes of the plant Curcuma longa and shows intrinsic anti-cancer properties. Its medical use remains limited due to its extremely low water solubility and bioavailability. Addressing this problem, drug delivery systems accompanied by nanoparticle technology have emerged. The present study introduces a novel nanocarrier system, so-called CurcuEmulsomes, where curcumin is encapsulated inside the solid core of emulsomes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Serbia 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 16%
Student > Master 22 11%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 18 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 38 19%
Unknown 57 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 37 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Chemistry 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 67 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2014.
All research outputs
#699,801
of 25,602,335 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#22
of 1,959 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,983
of 321,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#2
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,602,335 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,959 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.