↓ Skip to main content

Bladder pain syndrome: validation of simple tests for diagnosis in women with chronic pelvic pain: BRaVADO study protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bladder pain syndrome: validation of simple tests for diagnosis in women with chronic pelvic pain: BRaVADO study protocol
Published in
Reproductive Health, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-10-61
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seema A Tirlapur, Lee Priest, Daniel Wojdyla, Khalid S Khan

Abstract

Bladder pain syndrome (BPS), a condition with no gold standard diagnosis, comprises of a cluster of signs and symptoms. Bladder filling pain and bladder wall tenderness are two basic clinical features, present in a high number of sufferers. This study will validate the performance of these simple tests for BPS in women with chronic pelvic pain (CPP).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Spain 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 9 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Psychology 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 10 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2013.
All research outputs
#2,744,791
of 3,616,414 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#211
of 245 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,505
of 111,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#20
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 3,616,414 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 245 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 111,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.