↓ Skip to main content

Foods with added fiber improve stool frequency in individuals with chronic kidney disease with no impact on appetite or overall quality of life

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Foods with added fiber improve stool frequency in individuals with chronic kidney disease with no impact on appetite or overall quality of life
Published in
BMC Research Notes, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1756-0500-6-510
Pubmed ID
Authors

Younis A Salmean, Gordon A Zello, Wendy J Dahl

Abstract

Fiber intake may be low in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to diet restriction and/or poor appetite associated with uremic symptoms, contributing to constipation and reduced quality of life. This report describes the effects of foods with added fiber on gastrointestinal function and symptoms, clinical markers, and quality of life in CKD patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 1%
Sri Lanka 1 1%
Unknown 73 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 11%
Student > Master 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Professor 3 4%
Other 13 17%
Unknown 30 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 28%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 32 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2013.
All research outputs
#12,695,167
of 22,733,113 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,495
of 4,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#157,381
of 306,767 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#40
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,733,113 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,259 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,767 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.