You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing the complexity of interventions within systematic reviews: development, content and use of a new tool (iCAT_SR)
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Research Methodology, April 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12874-017-0349-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Simon Lewin, Maggie Hendry, Jackie Chandler, Andrew D. Oxman, Susan Michie, Sasha Shepperd, Barnaby C. Reeves, Peter Tugwell, Karin Hannes, Eva A. Rehfuess, Vivien Welch, Joanne E. Mckenzie, Belinda Burford, Jennifer Petkovic, Laurie M. Anderson, Janet Harris, Jane Noyes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 204 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 54 | 26% |
Canada | 18 | 9% |
United States | 14 | 7% |
Australia | 9 | 4% |
Spain | 5 | 2% |
South Africa | 5 | 2% |
Chile | 4 | 2% |
New Zealand | 3 | 1% |
Ireland | 3 | 1% |
Other | 19 | 9% |
Unknown | 70 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 100 | 49% |
Scientists | 72 | 35% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 26 | 13% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 184 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 35 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 13% |
Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
Other | 12 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 20% |
Unknown | 43 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 37 | 20% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 24 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 17 | 9% |
Psychology | 13 | 7% |
Engineering | 5 | 3% |
Other | 29 | 16% |
Unknown | 59 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 122. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#354,263
of 25,965,655 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#22
of 2,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,231
of 327,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#2
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,965,655 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,343 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.