You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pregnancy outcome after use of cranberry in pregnancy – the Norwegian mother and child cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-345 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kristine Heitmann, Hedvig Nordeng, Lone Holst |
| Abstract |
Cranberry is one of the most commonly used herbs during pregnancy. The herb has been used traditionally against urinary tract infections. No studies are found that specifically address the risk of malformations after use of cranberry during pregnancy. The aim of the study was to investigate the safety of cranberry use during pregnancy, including any effects on congenital malformations and selected pregnancy outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 14% |
| Australia | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Malawi | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 9% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 37% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 14 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 11 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 15 | 12% |
| Unknown | 31 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2023.
All research outputs
#6,418,662
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#1,027
of 3,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,265
of 321,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#29
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.