↓ Skip to main content

Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J Volk, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Dawn Stacey, Glyn Elwyn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 210 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 19%
Researcher 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 54 25%
Unknown 25 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 30 14%
Psychology 20 9%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 37 17%
Unknown 34 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#5,200,039
of 21,357,544 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#468
of 1,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,182
of 303,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#59
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,357,544 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 303,810 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.