↓ Skip to main content

Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
165 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, November 2013
DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-s2-s1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert J Volk, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Dawn Stacey, Glyn Elwyn

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 41 20%
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 52 26%
Unknown 19 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 74 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Psychology 20 10%
Social Sciences 11 5%
Computer Science 6 3%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 28 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2016.
All research outputs
#3,285,037
of 17,364,317 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#314
of 1,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,904
of 272,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#48
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,364,317 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.