You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Costs and consequences of large-scale vector control for malaria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-7-258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Joshua O Yukich, Christian Lengeler, Fabrizio Tediosi, Nick Brown, Jo-Ann Mulligan, Des Chavasse, Warren Stevens, John Justino, Lesong Conteh, Rajendra Maharaj, Marcy Erskine, Dirk H Mueller, Virginia Wiseman, Tewolde Ghebremeskel, Mehari Zerom, Catherine Goodman, David McGuire, Juan Manuel Urrutia, Fana Sakho, Kara Hanson, Brian Sharp |
| Abstract |
Five large insecticide-treated net (ITN) programmes and two indoor residual spraying (IRS) programmes were compared using a standardized costing methodology. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 1% |
| Kenya | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Mozambique | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 17% |
| Researcher | 27 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 35 | 21% |
| Unknown | 17 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 43 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 19% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,397,991
of 25,271,884 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#1,338
of 5,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,024
of 169,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,271,884 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,888 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.