↓ Skip to main content

Making decisions about treatment for young people diagnosed with depressive disorders: a qualitative study of clinicians’ experiences

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Making decisions about treatment for young people diagnosed with depressive disorders: a qualitative study of clinicians’ experiences
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-13-335
Pubmed ID
Authors

Magenta B Simmons, Sarah E Hetrick, Anthony F Jorm

Abstract

The imperative to provide effective treatment for young people diagnosed with depressive disorders is complicated by several factors including the unclear effectiveness of treatment options. Within this context, little is known about how treatment decisions are made for this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Unknown 156 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 17%
Student > Master 22 14%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Other 25 16%
Unknown 35 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 45 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 12%
Social Sciences 15 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2013.
All research outputs
#21,264,673
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#4,457
of 4,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,680
of 313,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#84
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,195 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.