↓ Skip to main content
Embed badge What is this page?

Epigenetic rather than genetic factors may explain phenotypic divergence between coastal populations of diploid and tetraploid Limonium spp. (Plumbaginaceae) in Portugal

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Plant Biology, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley

What is this page?

Summary Twitter Dimensions citations
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Epigenetic rather than genetic factors may explain phenotypic divergence between coastal populations of diploid and tetraploid Limonium spp. (Plumbaginaceae) in Portugal
Published in
BMC Plant Biology, December 2013
DOI 10.1186/1471-2229-13-205
Pubmed ID
24314092
Authors

Ana Sofia Róis, Carlos M Rodríguez López, Ana Cortinhas, Matthias Erben, Dalila Espírito-Santo, Michael J Wilkinson, Ana D Caperta

Abstract

The genus Limonium Miller comprises annual and perennial halophytes that can produce sexual and/or asexual seeds (apomixis). Genetic and epigenetic (DNA methylation) variation patterns were investigated in populations of three phenotypically similar putative sexual diploid species (L. nydeggeri, L. ovalifolium, L. lanceolatum), one sexual tetraploid species (L. vulgare) and two apomict tetraploid species thought to be related (L. dodartii, L. multiflorum). The extent of morphological differentiation between these species was assessed using ten diagnostic morphometric characters.

View on publisher site

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 2 4%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 45 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 6 12%
Professor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 66%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2013.
All research outputs
#12,577,837
of 19,104,481 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#1,246
of 2,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,502
of 285,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#72
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,104,481 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,714 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.

This page is provided by Altmetric.